(Adding categories) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This report analyzes existing law and [[policy]] for handling [[criminal history record information]] ([[CHRI]]); identifies the [[technological]] and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice [[privacy]] environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of [[criminal justice information]] law and [[policy]]. |
This report analyzes existing law and [[policy]] for handling [[criminal history record information]] ([[CHRI]]); identifies the [[technological]] and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice [[privacy]] environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of [[criminal justice information]] law and [[policy]]. |
||
+ | |||
+ | This project report begins with a review of [[information privacy]] law and [[policy]]. It identifies five interests critical to a democracy and that are served by [[information privacy]]: (1) [[due process]] and fairness, (2) individual dignity, (3) individ-ual [[autonomy]], (4) oversight and [[trust]] in governmental institutions, and (5) the promotion of [[privacy]]-dependent relationships. |
||
[[Category:Publication]] |
[[Category:Publication]] |
||
[[Category:Criminal]] |
[[Category:Criminal]] |
Revision as of 03:28, 26 November 2014
Citation
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Report of the National Task Force on Privacy, Technology, and Criminal Justice Information (NCJ 187669) (Aug. 2001) (full-text).
Overview
This report analyzes existing law and policy for handling criminal history record information (CHRI); identifies the technological and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice privacy environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of criminal justice information law and policy.
This project report begins with a review of information privacy law and policy. It identifies five interests critical to a democracy and that are served by information privacy: (1) due process and fairness, (2) individual dignity, (3) individ-ual autonomy, (4) oversight and trust in governmental institutions, and (5) the promotion of privacy-dependent relationships.