(Created page with "== Citation == U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, '''Report of the National Task Force on Privacy, Technology, and Criminal Justice Information''' ...") |
(Adding categories) Tag: categoryselect |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This report analyzes existing law and [[policy]] for handling [[criminal history record information]] ([[CHRI]]); identifies the [[technological]] and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice [[privacy]] environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of [[criminal justice information]] law and [[policy]]. |
This report analyzes existing law and [[policy]] for handling [[criminal history record information]] ([[CHRI]]); identifies the [[technological]] and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice [[privacy]] environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of [[criminal justice information]] law and [[policy]]. |
||
+ | |||
+ | This project report begins with a review of [[information privacy]] law and [[policy]]. It identifies five interests critical to a democracy and that are served by [[information privacy]]: (1) [[due process]] and fairness, (2) individual dignity, (3) individ-ual [[autonomy]], (4) oversight and [[trust]] in governmental institutions, and (5) the promotion of [[privacy]]-dependent relationships. |
||
+ | [[Category:Publication]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Criminal]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Policy]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Data]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Privacy]] |
||
+ | [[Category:2001]] |
Latest revision as of 21:56, 1 August 2015
Citation[]
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Report of the National Task Force on Privacy, Technology, and Criminal Justice Information (NCJ 187669) (Aug. 2001) (full-text).
Overview[]
This report analyzes existing law and policy for handling criminal history record information (CHRI); identifies the technological and societal developments that may be changing the criminal justice privacy environment; and makes initial recommendations to address the next generation of criminal justice information law and policy.
This project report begins with a review of information privacy law and policy. It identifies five interests critical to a democracy and that are served by information privacy: (1) due process and fairness, (2) individual dignity, (3) individ-ual autonomy, (4) oversight and trust in governmental institutions, and (5) the promotion of privacy-dependent relationships.