The IT Law Wiki


National Cash Register Co. v. Modern Transfer Co., 224 Pa. Super. 138, 302 A.2d 486 (1973) (full-text).

Factual Background[]

The defendant refused to accept an installed National Cash Register (NCR) computer, claiming that NCR had made a number of oral misrepresentations which induced Modern Transfer to execute the purchase contract.[1]

Trial Court Proceedings[]

The court looked to the integration clause and, finding that its intent was to exclude prior statements from the final agreement, refused to admit testimony which contradicted the terms of the contract.[2]


  1. 224 Pa. Super. at 140-42, 302 A.2d at 487-88.
  2. Id. at 144-45, 302 A.2d at 490-91.