Citation[]
Intel Corp. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 946 F.2d 821, 832 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (full-text).
Factual Background[]
The claims of the patent only required "programmable selection means."
Federal Circuit Proceedings[]
The Court held that the "programmable" claim language required only that the accused product could be programmed to perform the claimed functionality.