The IT Law Wiki
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Random page
TopContent
Most Visited Pages
Cell phone
RFID tag
Radio frequency spectrum
Cloud consumer
Internet
Newly Changed Pages
Computer terminal
Persuasive evidence
Website operator
Bfdi
Email bombing
Pornography
Message modification
Most Popular Pages
community
Community portal
forum
FANDOM
Fan Central
BETA
Games
Anime
Movies
TV
Video
Wikis
Explore Wikis
Community Central
Start a Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Sign In
Sign In
Register
The IT Law Wiki
34,539
pages
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Random page
TopContent
Most Visited Pages
Cell phone
RFID tag
Radio frequency spectrum
Cloud consumer
Internet
Newly Changed Pages
Computer terminal
Persuasive evidence
Website operator
Bfdi
Email bombing
Pornography
Message modification
Most Popular Pages
community
Community portal
forum
Editing
17 U.S.C. § 117
Back to page
Edit
Edit source
View history
Talk (0)
Edit Page
17 U.S.C. § 117
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit appears to have already been undone.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Introduction == [http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/117.html Current section 117] of the [[Copyright Act of 1976]] was enacted in the [[Computer Software Copyright Act of 1980]] in response to the recommendations of the [[National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works]] ([[CONTU]]). Section 117 provides a limited exception to the blanket rule against [[copying]], by allowing one who owns a [[copy]] of a [[computer program]] to copy the [[program]] as necessary to use the [[program]] or do machine [[maintenance]] or [[repair]], and as an [[archival backup]], subject to certain limitations. Section 117 provides: {{Quote|Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an [[copyright infringement|infringement]] for the owner of a [[copy]] of a [[computer program]] to make or authorize the making of another [[copy]] or [[adaptation]] of that [[computer program]] provided: (1) that such a new [[copy]] or [[adaptation]] is created as an [[essential step]] in the utilization of the [[computer program]] in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or (2) that such new [[copy]] or [[adaptation]] is for [[archival purposes]] only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the [[computer program]] should cease to be rightful. Under Section 117, the rights of a [[copyright owner]] in a [[computer program]] are limited such that the owner (but not a licensee, borrower or mere possessor) of a particular [[copy]] of a [[computer program]] may make a [[copy]] or [[adaptation]] of the [[program]] as an "[[essential step]]" in using the [[computer program]] in a [[computer]] or for [[archival purposes]].}} Any identical [[copies]] made in accordance with Section 117 "may be leased, sold, or otherwise transferred, along with the [[copy]] from which such copies were prepared, only as part of the lease, sale, or other transfer of all rights in the [[program]]." [[Adaptation]]s made may be transferred only with the authorization of the [[copyright owner|owner]] of the [[copyright]] in the original [[program]]. == Essential step in the utilization of the computer program == Section 117(a) provides that "it is not an infringement of copyright for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making or adaptation of that computer program" under two circumstances. The first is if the making of the copy or adaptation is "an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine, and that [the copy] is used in no other manner." Essentially, this allows the [[lawful owner]] of a piece of [[software]] to [[install]] it on his machine, even if doing so requires [[copying]] the [[program]] from a [[CD-ROM]] to the [[hard drive]] or [[load]]ing it from the [[hard drive]] into [[RAM]], both of which are considered [[reproduction]] under [[copyright law]].<ref>''See'' [[Micro-Sparc v. Amtype|Micro-Sparc, Inc. v. Amtype Corp.]], 592 F.Supp. 33 (D. Mass. 1984) (holding that purchasers of [[program]]s sold in printed form do not [[copyright infringement|infringe copyright]] by typing the code into a [[computer]] in order to use the [[program]]s); [[Summit v. High-Line|Summit Tech., Inc. v. High-Line Med. Instrs. Co.]], 922 F.Supp. 299 (C.D. Cal. 1996) (holding that owners of opthamological laser system did not [[copyright infringement|infringe copyright]] by turning on system to use it, causing a [[copy]] of the manufacturer's [[data]] table to be [[load]]ed into system 's [[RAM]]). ''Cf.'' [[MAI v. Peak|MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.]], 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993) (holding that [[load]]ing of [[copyright]]ed [[software]] into [[RAM]] by a service company constitutes [[reproduction]]).</ref> == Archival purposes == The second circumstance in which Section 117 allows [[copying]] is if the [[copy]] is "for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful."<ref>17 U.S.C. §117(a)(2).</ref> This provision allows one who owns a piece of [[software]] to make a [[backup copy]] for safekeeping, but requires him to destroy his [[backup copies]] if he sells or otherwise transfers his original [[copy]] or if his ownership otherwise ceases to be rightful. == Computer maintenance == A third subsection of Section 117 provides it is not an [[copyright infringement|infringement]] for a machine's owner or lessee to make or authorize the making of a [[copy]] of a [[computer program]] if the [[copy]] is made solely as a result of the activation of a machine containing a lawful [[copy]] of the [[software]], and the [[copy]] is used solely to repair or maintain the machine, and is destroyed immediately thereafter.<ref>17 U.S.C. §117(c); ''see also'' [[Storage Technology v. Custom Hardware|Storage Tech. Corp. v. Custom Hardware Eng'g & Consulting, Inc.]], 431 F.3d 1374, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2005).</ref> == Owner of a copy of a computer program == Section 117's exceptions benefit the "owner of a [[copy]] of a [[computer program]]" or, in the case of machine repair and maintenance, "the owner or lessee of a machine."<ref>17 U.S.C. §117(a),(c).</ref> However, because most [[computer software]] is [[distribute]]d subject to a [[license]], rather than a conventional sale, the question arises (in much the same way as it does in the context of "[[first sale]]" under 17 U.S.C. §109) whether Section 117 allows [[copying]] by a person who has legally obtained a [[copy]] of a [[computer program]], but [[license]]s rather than "owns" the [[software]]. As with the analogous first sale question, courts are split on the issue.<ref>''Compare'' [[Krause v. Titleserv]], Inc., 402 F.3d 119 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding client to be an "owner," for §117(a) purposes, of [[copies]] of [[computer program]]s written for it by consultant despite lack of formal title in [[copies]], because it had paid consultant to [[software development|develop]] [[program]]s for its sole benefit, [[copies]] were [[store]]d on client's [[server]], and client had right to use or discard copies as it saw fit) ''with'' [[CMAX v. UCR|CMAX/Cleveland, Inc. v. UCR, Inc.]], 804 F. Supp. 337 (M.D. Ga. 1992) (holding that a [[licensee]] of a [[copyright]]ed [[computer software]] system and its employees were not entitled to [[computer program]] owner's defense to [[copyright]] holder's [[copyright infringement]] action, because the [[licensee]] and employees never "owned" the [[copy]] of the [[program]], and there was evidence that the [[licensee]] was going to market the [[program]]); ''cf.'' [[ISC-Bunker Ramo v. Altech|ISC-Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Altech, Inc.]], 765 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ill. 1990) (holding that the defendant was not entitled to §117 exception because it acquired the [[copy]] from competitor and its possession was unauthorized).</ref> ==References== <references /> [[Category:Legislation]] [[Category:Legislation-U.S.-Federal]] [[Category:Legislation-U.S.-Copyright]] [[Category:Copyright]] [[Category:Software]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to the The IT Law Wiki are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:Quote
(
view source
)
Follow on IG
TikTok
Join Fan Lab